History of the Hovercraft
History of the Hovercraft
Authored and compiled by:
Water: The Ancient Highway
The growth of civilization occurred within view of – and in many ways because of – our seas and rivers. Since the beginning of human history, we have been shaped by our ability to carry goods and people across water – our most ancient highway.
Without a means of water transportation, ancient mariners could not have explored the world or traded goods. Civilizations that mastered ship building and sailing inevitably prospered as centers of trade, culture and power, and the earliest cities were located on seashores or rivers. The superiority of water transport over ground transport was so apparent to even the earliest civilizations that canal building was one of mankind's earliest engineering achievements.
In 1775 Adam Smith, the first economist, recognized the importance of water transportation in his revolutionary book An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. In his analysis of why some nations are more prosperous than others, Smith examined the advantages of water over ground transportation - one ship with six or eight men could carry as much as 50 wagons attended by hundreds of men and 400 horses - and concluded that communication across water has always been the least expensive form of transportation. Water travel requires less manpower than overland travel and can accommodate far greater loads than wagons, animals or more recent ground transport vehicles.
Breaking the Water Barrier
Throughout history, mankind has been intent upon finding ways to transport larger loads and to increase the speed of load movement. From their inception, ground and air transport vehicles have dramatically and continuously increased their speed. Such is not the case with vehicles that travel across water, because they have to contend with the strong resistance of water – the water barrier.
One factor that creates the water barrier is water density. The density of water is 815 times the density of air. As a ship increases speed, the resistance of the water increases exponentially, causing huge increases in power to achieve only small gains in speed.
One method of describing transport efficiency is the movement of a specific load over a specific distance in a specific time. Speed equals distance divided by time; therefore, transport efficiency is the movement of a specific load multiplied by the speed at which it can be moved.
When a load is moved via water, the various resistances increase as the velocity times itself, and the energy needed to affect an increase in speed rises as the energy cubed, or energy multiplied by itself three times (the exact power is 3.0) This is a huge number.
Another way to think of this problem is to consider the lift-to-drag ratio. The load has to float or be lifted by the water; this results in drag (resistance) when movement commences. A boat has a lift-to-drag ratio about ten times lower than a steel wheel rolling on a steel rail. The only way to improve the lift-to-drag ration of a boat is to lift the boat's hull and load completely out of the water, which reduces wave production and surface parasitic drag.
In a quest to break the water barrier, to improve the lift-to-drag ratio and decrease the resistance of water, many vehicles have been invented, especially during the last three centuries. It is an old idea to pump air under a ship's hull in order to reduce resistance, but the obvious and simple approaches to this idea do not work; the entire hull has to be lifted off the surface. The majority of the modern inventions are based on the idea of lifting the water displacement hull, or lifting the load-carrying device out of the water. These include hydroplanes, hydrofoils and air cushion vehicles. (The hovercraft is one type of air cushion vehicle.) Among them, the air cushion vehicle has the best lift-to-drag ratio of any device that travels across water when speeds exceed 35 mph.
1700 – 1900: The Genesis of Air Cushion Vehicles
When it comes to flying machines, ideas easily date back to ancient Greece. This is not the case with air cushion vehicles. The first recorded design for such a vehicle was in 1716 by Emanuel Swedenborg, a Swedish designer, philosopher and theologian. Swedenborg's design appeared in the fourth edition of Sweden's first scientific journal, Daedulus Hyperboreus, and is the first detailed technical description of a flying machine of any type.
Swedenborg's man-powered air cushion platform, basically a circular aircraft, resembled an upside-down boat with a cockpit in the center or a "flying saucer." His manually operated device required the would-be pilot to use oar-like scoops to push air under the vehicle on each downward stroke in order to raise the hull out of the water. A working model of the design was never built, because Swedenborg soon realized that a human could not sustain the energy needed to power the oars. His concept required a source of energy far greater than any available at that time. As with many other forms of transportation, significant progress had to wait until a lightweight motor was developed in the nineteenth century.
In 1865, William Fronde of the British Admiralty sent a letter to B. J. Tideman, who was the Chief Constructor of the Royal Netherlands Navy, proposing the principle of air lubrication. The letter is on display at the David Taylor Model Basin in Washington D.C. and also appears on page 109 of J. Scott Russell's book, The Modern System of Naval Architecture, 1865, Vol. I.
In the mid-1870s, the British engineer Sir John Thornycroft built a number of ground effect machine test models based on his theory that an air cushion system would reduce the drag of water on boats and ships. His theory was that if a vessel's hull were designed with a concave bottom in which air could be contained between the hull and the water, it would create significantly less resistance. He filed a number of patents involving air-lubricated hulls through 1877. The internal combustion engine had not yet been invented, however, so the technology required to power his inventions still did not exist. In addition, no one had yet discovered a practical solution to the problem of how to keep a cushion of air trapped so it could not escape below a vessel.
In 1876, John B. Ward of San Francisco, California USA, suggested an aluminum platform with rotary fans to drive air down and backwards, but wheels would push the device along. He received US Patents 185465 and 195860 for his "aerial machines."
The first patent for air lubrication in Great Britain was issued to another Swedish engineer, Gustaf de Laval, in 1882 but because the method for retaining the cushion of air was not yet resolved, de Laval was not successful with his experiments. British Patent 5841 details a ship built with de Laval's ideas. Information on this ship can be found on pages 33-34 in the book Speed and Power of Ships by Admiral D.W. Taylor, published in 1933.
In 1888, James Walker of Texas was granted US Patent 624271 in which channels along the underside of boats contained air that would be captured in the adjacent channel as it tried to escape. US Patent 608757, obtained in 1897 by Culbertson, includes an idea that led to the first suggestion for sidewall air cushion vehicles.
Air lubrication has been applied to many industrial processes and applications, including railways. The concept of a "sliding railway," a train that rode on small hoverskirted pads using water under pressure, was first proposed in 1868 by the French engineer Monsieur Louis Girard. A working example was operated in 1886 for 900 miles in the LeJouchere Park. After Girard was killed in the Franco-German war, one of his assistant engineers, M. Barre, improved upon Girard's ideas and constructed a sliding railway at London's Crystal Palace in 1891. The London News hailed the invention as "a marvelous invention … a singularly original contrivance for enabling trains to run by means of waterpower at speed hitherto undreamed of … something which may eclipse the electric motors."
1900 – 1950: The Evolution of Air Cushion Vehicles
Experiments with air cushion vehicles began in earnest after a suitable power source, the engine, became a reality, and after imaginations were fostered by the development of the airplane. As the airplane evolved as a viable vehicle after the renowned Wright Brothers flight in 1903, more attention was paid to the fact that additional lift was created if an airplane flew close to land or water, creating a "funnel effect" or cushion of air. This became known as ground effect.
Realizing that pressurized air reacts against the surface of water and enables a vessel to skim over the water rather than through it, naval architects patented several designs intended to solve the problem of water resistance, or hydrodynamic drag. Onboard fans would force compressed air into a chamber beneath, lubricating the hull with air from stem to stern, which would raise it slightly above the water.
World War I brought the development of the airplane as a military weapon which, in turn, fostered technological interest, and scientists and innovators began exploring the ground effect/air cushion effect in earnest.
Various forms of air cushion craft began to evolve after the first working example was demonstrated in 1916. At that time, Dagobert Muller von Thomamhul, an Austrian engineer, designed and built an air cushion torpedo boat for the Austrian Navy, which used fans to pump air beneath the hull to form a lubricating air cushion. Further development was abandoned when World War I destroyed the Austrian Navy and the empire.
During this same period of time, there were a number of prolific inventors of air-lubricated boats. F.W. Schweder obtained British Patent 4131 in 1906 in which improvements upon De Laval's ideas were proposed. In 1907 Joseph Clark received US Patent 989834 for an air vehicle. Charles Theryc of France proposed yet another rail concept between 1902 and 1915, for which he received British Patent 5569. These trains rode on air and many patents were issued that dealt with air edge seals. Two examples are US Patent 1152451 and British Patent 9011 of 1915. Another French inventor, M.A. Gambin, submitted British Patent Application 188648 in 1921 for a sidewall-type air cushion vehicle.
James Porter, a British engineer, received a series of patents dating from 1908, including British Patent 21216 and US Patent 1016359. In 1913, Porter suggested a machine with ideas very similar to annular jet air cushion air supply systems, and received British Patent 975 in 1914, which shows an annular duct quite similar to those of present day hovercraft.
Also in 1908, Charles Worthington, an American, suggested a vehicle supported on air but riding in a conduit. A similar proposal was made in 1913 by A.F. Eells, also an American. Other early air cushion vehicle inventors in the United States included F.G. Trask of North Dakota, who patented a sliding railway in 1922; V.F. Casey of Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Douglas Kent Warner of Sarasota, Florida.
In 1925, Casey received U.S. Patent 1621625 for the first air cushion recirculation concept. His design featured a flat-bottomed vessel with a series of longitudinal air channels open on the underside by which cushion air could be returned.
Warner, the head of Warner Research Laboratories at Tamiama Trail, Sarasota, Florida, carried out considerable research and development on air-cushioned boats in the 1920s and he held many patents; examples are US Patents 1819216, 2277620 and 2365676. To simplify his designs, which apparently experienced wave-pumping problems, his machines incorporated the ram wing concept. In 1929, Warner won boat races in Connecticut by the use of the trapped air cushion or captured air bubble principle on his sidehull craft. Warner's craft was the genesis of the surface effect ship (SES) of today.
A.U. Alcock, an electrical engineer in Perth, Australia, built a working model air cushion vehicle, which was demonstrated to the press and government officials in 1912. Alcock called his invention "Floating Traction," for which he received Australian Patent 14309. He later demonstrated other models at the Cricklewood Ice Rink in 1939.
In 1927, K.E. Tsiolkovski, a noted Russian scientist, developed what today might be called the hovertrain. T.J. Kaario of Finland built and tested a ground effect machine in 1935, and received Finnish Patents 18630 and 26122. Other inventors of air-lubricated boats during this period of history include J.C. Hansen-Euehammer of Denmark, Henry Clay of London, Great Britain and C.J. Lake of the United States. There were more than 100 patents on this subject filed before 1962.
Soon after heavier-than-air flight began, it was discovered that flying close to the surface, within the width (cord) of the wing, requires less energy to remain in the air. This became known as the ground effect phenomenon. Ground effect is a function of the width of the wing; to take advantage of the ground effect, any vehicle must fly above the ground at an altitude less than the distance between the leading and trailing edge of the wing.
The German Dornier DO-X twelve-engined flying boat proved the reality of the air cushion ground effect in 1929 by crossing the Atlantic Ocean entirely in ground effect at low altitude close to the water. As a result, the aircraft's fuel consumption decreased. During World War II, aircraft were flown to make use of air cushion ground effect in order to extend reconnaissance flight range.
American aviator Charles Lindbergh is reported to have flown in ground effect in order to conserve fuel during his historic transatlantic flight in 1927. The challenge of flying along the wave tops no doubt also served to stave off boredom during his long journey!
These and other beginnings formed the foundation for the various forms of air cushion supported vehicles that later appeared on the modern scene. Not until the 1950s, however, was a solution found for the problem that had thwarted all previous attempts: how to retain the cushion of air beneath the vessel.
1950 – 1964: The Birth of the Air Cushion Vehicle/Hovercraft Industry
The successful use of the air cushion effect in World War II aircraft inspired British, American, Russian and Swiss engineers to seriously explore innovative ways to apply it. The many experimental models that emerged prior to the 1950s were developed as flying boats rather than true air cushion vehicles, and they were known as ram wings as well as ground effect machines. The terms air cushion vehicle and hovercraft were not used until the late 1950s. For a complete diagram of the many terms by which air cushion vehicles and hovercraft have been known throughout the years, see Air Cushion Vehicle Family Tree.
Serious practical development of today's hovercraft began in the mid-1950s in Great Britain, when Christopher Cockerell, generally accepted as the inventor of the hovercraft, began to explore the use of air lubrication to reduce hydrodynamic drag. Cockerell was a brilliant radio engineer who was retired from the army and operated a boatyard on the Norfolk Broads. During his lifetime, Cockerell was granted more than 70 patents for his inventions, many of them dealing with hovercraft, and he was knighted for his achievements.
Sir Christopher Cockerell's theory was that instead of using the plenum chamber – an open-bottomed empty box such as Thornycroft had devised – if air could instead be pumped into a narrow tunnel around the perimeter of the underneath side of the craft, it would flow toward the center, creating a more effective air cushion. This peripheral jet would allow the air pressure to build enough to equal the weight of the craft and, since the air would be trapped, the pressure would elevate the craft off the surface upon which it traveled.
Cockerell tested his theory with a test model constructed of two empty cans, an industrial air blower and a pair of kitchen scales. By inserting a cat food can into a coffee can, and blowing air through the gap between the two cans, he showed that it was possible to increase the hoverheight and to construct a vehicle that could travel on a cushion of air.
Originally, Cockerell had imitated previous designs that used fans to force air down from the deck into the chamber below, which meant that air had to be continually pumped back in to replace the air that had escaped. He then devised a new system: he made the hull of the craft concave and angled air jets from the circumference in toward the center of the craft to create a continuous air curtain. This effectively solved the problems of keeping the air pressure stable and raising the hoverheight.
In 1955, Cockerell built a working model and was issued British Patent 854211 for a vehicle that was "neither an airplane, nor a boat, nor a wheeled land craft." Cockerell described his invention as "a very expensive motorcar tire with a permanent puncture." He named it the hovercraft, which he registered as a commercial name, so it was not available for general use until later when he generously handed the name over to public domain.
This model, which illustrated his annular peripheral jet system with inturned jets, led to the birth of the air cushion vehicle/hovercraft industry. In his efforts to turn his invention into a commercial product, Cockerell demonstrated it for British military officials in 1956, who immediately classified it as secret, effectively halting commercial development for the next year.
As news filtered in that other countries were pursuing hovercraft development, the government realized that Britain would sacrifice its place as the world leader in this emerging technology if development did not resume. Cockerell was then given permission to approach the National Research Development Corporation (NRDC), a government-financed agency who could back further development if the hovercraft could be freed from the secret list.
In 1958, Cockerell's invention was removed from the secret list, permitting hovercraft development for civilian use; the value of the hovercraft for military use had yet to be demonstrated. The NRDC then contracted the Westland Aircraft Company's Saunders-Roe division to build a full-scale research hovercraft from Cockerell's concept, which was named the Saunders Roe Nautical One (SR.N1).
On 25 July 1959 - fifty years to the day that Louis Bleriot made the first crossing of the Dover Strait by airplane - the world's first man-carrying hovercraft, the SR.N1, crossed the English Channel from Calais, France to Dover, England. The press turned out in force, and this amazing new invention captured the world's attention.
The SR.N1 carried only three passengers. Cockerell traveled as moveable ballast; Commander Peter Lamb piloted the craft and John Chaplin served as engineer and additional moveable ballast. Another mechanic failed to wake up in time and was left in France. As of 2004, John Chaplin is still living and resides in Virginia, USA.
Due to its low one-foot hoverheight, the SR.N1 was plagued by wave impacts greater than one foot. Another British inventor, C.H. Latimer-Needham, had followed Cockerell's developments. He realized that the wave clearance problem could be solved with a rubber skirt to contain the air cushion; a flexible skirt would collapse temporarily when it impacted waves or obstacles, then return to its inflated shape.
The introduction of the flexible hovercraft skirt was a crucial engineering breakthrough. The skirtless SR.N.1 of 1959 could only operate on calm seas at low speeds. After the SR.N1 was fitted with a 4-foot flexible skirt in 1962, it could cope comfortably with 6-7-foot waves, cross marshland with gullies up to 4 feet deep and clear obstacles over 3 feet high. In addition, the SR.N1 could now operate at twice its original weight with no increase in lift power. Just one decade after the introduction of Cockerell's hovercraft, its descendents, fifty times heavier and three times as fast, would ferry a third of all passengers and cars across the English Channel for some thirty years' duration.
The Development of the Heavy Hovercraft Industry
With the introduction of the flexible skirt, the term air cushion vehicle was first applied to this new and fascinating invention, and ACV development was initially very rapid. The advent of the flexible skirt launched hovercraft technology and practical usage, and also defined the difference between hovercraft and all other types of air cushion vehicles. The flexible skirt fostered the inception of the air cushion vehicle/hovercraft industry worldwide, from the introduction of 300-ton passenger/car ferries moving more than two million passengers per year, to the construction of massive hoverbarges, to amphibious assault vehicles and LCACs (Landing Craft Air Cushion). SR.N1s built in the US were first used by the United States military in the Vietnam War.
In October of 2000, the Princess Margaret and the Princess
Anne, two of the world's largest hovercraft, were retired
after thirty years of ferrying tens of millions of passengers
across the English Channel. The Princess Margaret was featured
in the James Bond Film, Diamonds are Forever. Both Princesses
are now (2004) kept in service operational condition at the
British Hovercraft Museum at Gosport, Great Britain.
The Development of the Light Hovercraft Industry
After the rapid advances of the late 1950s and early 1960s, the hovercraft industry began to develop into two distinct categories: heavy (or large) hovercraft and light (or small) hovercraft. For purposes of definition, size and payload (carrying capacity) are used to distinguish light hovercraft from heavy hovercraft. Although the distinction is somewhat arbitrary, generally a light hovercraft is any vehicle that is wholly supported on a cushion of air and has an all-up weight that does not exceed 9.8kN (2,200 lbs.).
The unique mechanical curiosity, called a hovercraft by Sir Christopher Cockerell, excited the world's attention. Saunders Roe continued to manufacture heavy hovercraft, and other companies developed their own versions. But the media attention, particularly the heavy coverage by the British media, also enlivened the imaginations of hobbyists and mechanically minded enthusiasts everywhere.
Cockerell's hovercraft had all the appearance of a safe and inexpensive new type of flying machine and many saw the hovercraft as an affordable airplane. Experimenters who managed to construct a hovercraft that could actually hover soon began to consider manufacturing them as a business. This became a worldwide phenomenon and occurred in university laboratories, backyards and basements.
The evolution of small hovercraft was considerably influenced by local environments, and shared many similarities to the development of the sport motorcycle. European hovercraft began to develop into fast, single engine racing machines suitable for closed circuit racing, similar to the Café Racer style motorcycle that also originated in Europe. Hovercraft in the United States, however, followed a different course, much like chopper classic street motorcycles. The wide open spaces and bounty of long rivers in North America inspired hovercraft that were suited for traveling in a straight line and cruising with comfort. This difference can still be seen in today's hovercraft races: the European models excel on a tight, quick course, where the American models excel on the straights.
Event though it was relatively easy to construct hovercraft that would hover, they were still a long way from being workable and even further from being designs that were capable of forming the basis of a light hovercraft manufacturing business. Most entrepreneurial enthusiasts soon lost their zeal. Until 1964, light hovercraft were still quite crude, despite the major technical improvements documented in the general and scientific literature. What then happened in terms of development, starting with the world's first ground effect machine (hovercraft) race, was nothing short of amazing.
The World's First Hovercraft Race
In 1964 Canberra, the picturesque capital of Australia, was about to celebrate the opening of its new man-made Lake Burley Griffin. As part of the Canberra Day celebrations on Saturday 14 March 1964, the Canberra Branch of the Royal Aeronautical Society planned and promoted a commemorative hovercraft race. As N.F. Lamb, Chairman of the Canberra Branch of the RAeS stated, "The Hovercraft was chosen as a project because success is possible in this field by one man's personal efforts at a very limited cost."
There were twelve entries in the world's first hovercraft race, all of them from Australia. Eleven arrived at the site, ten participated, and only five actually finished the race. As journalist Eric Shackle reported, "Ten mostly backyard-built mechanical hares and tortoises competed in the world’s first hovercraft race … One of the amphibious hares sank, three had to be towed ashore, and a tortoise was first of only five to cross the finish line. The 10th failed to start."
More than 30,000 spectators attended the event, and it received extensive media coverage. Flight International magazine, London, reported in its special supplement on air cushion vehicles:
The event was a remarkable success, considering that Australia was remote from the technical developments occurring at the time in Europe and the participants were largely isolated with one another with little technical support or assistance. It was well summarized by N.F. Lamb, who was also an official at the race: "The trials were an outstanding success. They illustrated the ingenuity of the individual to allocate sufficient time and a little money to have a worthwhile hobby and make a first class machine. The ACV races have helped sustain a personal interest in aeronautics, which is extremely difficult, considering the high cost of aeroplanes."
The resultant interest generated by the world's first hovercraft race can be considered the initial stages of the light hovercraft industry.
Light Hovercraft Development in Australia
The "individual enthusiast" phase of the history of light hovercraft had already begun in Australia prior to 1964. Harold Clisby, an early enthusiast, owned an engineering company near Adelaide in South Australia, specializing in small air compressors. During the 1960s he developed a simple single-fan hovercraft with a 30 hp engine; it weighed about 230 lbs, was 7 feet in diameter, and could hover 2 ½ inches above the ground.
Another early experimenter, Chris Fitzgerald of Melbourne, was originally inspired by the television news broadcasts about the SR.N1 crossing of the English Channel. He began building model hovercraft with a group of friends, among them Rob Wilson, Arthur Boyd, Dennis Markham, Sam Ciliauro, Bernard Sutcher, Peter Kolf, and Eddy Thomas, who called themselves Hovercraft Research Organization.
Through his involvement in the Royal Australian Air Force Cadet Air Training Corps, Fitzgerald became a cadet instructor and formed a group within the Air Training Corps to experiment with rockets, gliders and hovercraft. The group met on weekends and established a workshop in one of the members' backyards.
Through Arthur Boyd, the group met David Atkins, as well as an American design student studying for his Master's Degree at Melbourne University who was interested in doing a study of hovercraft. Through him, the group became involved with the Mechanical Engineering School at Melbourne University in 1962 and changed their name to Australian Air Cushion Vehicles Development. At the same time, Chris Fitzgerald became employed as a Technical Assistant with the Aeronautical Research Laboratories in Melbourne, working full time on hovercraft-related experiments.
When the group learned that the Canberra Branch of the Royal Aeronautical Society was inviting all hovercraft groups to participate in the world's first hovercraft race, they decided to enter the experimental hovercraft being developed at Melbourne University. Their hovercraft, however, was plagued by mechanical failure at the race and did not place. After the race, it carried on as a useful research machine until it was cannibalized and the remains were burned around 1972 in Hastings, Victoria.
The group built a series of experimental test models and in 1966 moved their enterprise to the Fitzgerald family business location in Melbourne. In 1969, they built a workshop in Hastings near the mudflats and adjacent to the western port seashore.
As a result of these activities and the publicity they generated, Chris Fitzgerald received a Rotary Foundation Award in 1969 that enabled him to travel the world for two years in order to research the state of hovercraft development in numerous countries. During this time he studied aeronautical engineering at Farnborough Technical School in England and worked as an intern at British Hovercraft for several months.
Upon his return to Australia, the group changed its name and incorporated Neoteric Engineering Affiliates Pty. Ltd. A new design was initiated and a prototype, called the Neova, was developed, which gave the company a salable product. The company's first income was derived from the sale of an information package and do-it-yourself plans and instructions.
Because the Neova incorporated a number of technological improvements, a plan was formulated to sell these innovations to the new hovercraft manufacturers beginning to be established throughout the world. To facilitate the project, Chris Fitzgerald moved to Terre Haute, Indiana, USA in 1975 to establish the company’s headquarters.
By mid-1976, it was evident that a hovercraft manufacturing market for the company's technology did not exist, so the plan was modified to establish a manufacturing base in Terre Haute to initially sell hovercraft kit components. This evolved into an operation that manufactured and sold the entire vehicle: Neoteric Hovercraft, Inc., the world's original light hovercraft manufacturer.
Light Hovercraft Development in North America
Even though Sir Christopher Cockerell of Great Britain is generally accepted as the inventor of the hovercraft, there exists some controversy over whether the first hovercraft was actually developed in Great Britain or in the United States.
During the 1950s and early 1960s, at the same time as Sir Christopher Cockerell's achievements in Great Britain, an American inventor was following a similar path. Dr. William Bertelsen, a general practitioner in Illinois with an engineering background, had been seeking a practical method of alternative travel that would allow him to make house calls to his rural patients regardless of the weather.
Dr. Bertelsen first piloted his "flying aeromobile" in 1958, eight months earlier than Christopher Cockerell's first flight, and he filed United States Patents around the same time Cockerell Filed British Patents. Popular Science magazine featured Bertelsen's invention as the front-page story in its July 1959 issue. Dr. William Bertelsen founded Aeromobile, Inc., still in operation today, and continued to innovate and promote air cushion vehicles. In 1996, Dr. Bertelsen and his creations were filmed by the Discovery Channel as part of their Extreme Machines program. A great transportation inventor and visionary, Dr. Bertelsen was the recipient of the 2002 World Hovercraft Excellence Award.
The geographical environment also influenced hovercraft development in North America. In contrast with their British counterparts, enthusiasts were scattered across great distances. Since both the United States and Canada abounded in ideal hovercraft operating terrain, with vast river systems, enthusiasts were not as prone to get together to share selected sites, as was the case in Europe.
Communication between enthusiasts was sporadic, typically duplicating those of British publications. An Indiana USA enthusiast, Jan Eglen, formed the National Association of Air Cushion Vehicle Enthusiasts and published a newsletter called The Kestral. Eglen resigned in 1973 and another enthusiast, Rod McKeighan, transferred the club to Michigan and changed its name to the American Hovercraft Association.
The Association was in disarray in 1975 when Chris Fitzgerald moved his operation from Australia to Terre Haute, Indiana USA, where he had become acquainted with Jan Eglen during his Rotary Foundation world study tour. In 1976, Fitzgerald established and organized the Hoverclub of America, Inc., which has since become the largest hovercraft club in the world.
During the late 1960s and early 1970s, many attempts were made at commercialization. Several hovercraft manufacturers collectively produced approximately 3,000 hovercraft, which were sold through dealers. Unfortunately, manufacturers drifted away from their initial attempts to qualify dealers. Their hovercraft, therefore, often fell short of customer expectations and a great many hovercraft manufacturers did not succeed. Nevertheless, a few American hovercraft manufacturers have survived. Two of the most well known are Neoteric Hovercraft, Inc. and Universal Hovercraft.
In 1976, Robert Windt formed Universal Hovercraft in Cordova, Illinois USA. The company limited its sales to plans, propellers and fans, and along with Neoteric Hovercraft, Inc. has survived over the decades since their beginnings. Today, approximately 90% of all homebuilt hovercraft in the Hoverclub of America are Universal Hovercraft designs. In 2003 Chris Fitzgerald established DiscoverHover, a not-for-profit worldwide school hovercraft program in which students can build a hovercraft and compete in established hovercraft racing events. The free hovercraft plans provided by DiscoverHover are updated versions of Windt's Universal Hovercraft plans.
Light Hovercraft Development in Great Britain
In the early 1960s, the United Kingdom had an active group of light hovercraft experimenters. Outstanding among these was Geoff Harding, a mechanical engineer. In 1965 he proposed that an organization should be formed and a race meeting should be held so that individual enthusiasts would have the opportunity to compare ideas and to compete.
Europe's first amateur hovercraft rally took place at Apethorpe Hall, Northants. Lord Brassey, the owner of Apethorpe Hall, was quite interested in hovercraft. This was the beginning of the Hoverclub of Great Britain.
The winner of the race was Dan Reece. Reece had been the only British competitor in the world's first hovercraft race in Canberra in 1964. Reece went on to become the designer for Hover Air, Ltd., a company formed by Lord Brassey in 1966. Although the company eventually failed, it produced more than 100 Hoverhawk hovercraft, which were sold worldwide.
In the development of light hovercraft, Great Britain had the distinct geographical advantage of being a small country; enthusiasts lived within easy driving distance of each other and could meet frequently to compare and exchange ideas about their new machines. Great Britain, however, suffered a disadvantage in comparison to other nations, in that there were very few suitable areas for operating hovercraft. Most waterways and canals had incredibly low speed limits, such as 5 km/h (3 mph) and were crowded by fisherman. Although coastal regions were suitable for cruising hovercraft, the salt water meant high maintenance for the craft.
As a result, British Hoverclub members were forced to seek out suitable private estates and regional government lands for their rally activities. Many of these locations were subsequently developed into a national circuit for hovercraft racing, with the better courses located on the grounds of stately homes. Regulations, safety rules, points scoring, and classification were developed as courses were established. Regular rallies, hover-ins and especially competitive trials set the stage for development in the following decade. No other nation was so well equipped for the evolution of the sport of light hovercraft racing than Great Britain.
Technical Trends in Light Hovercraft
Early designers used engines that were readily available in their respective countries. Great Britain offered a wide variety of small, lightweight, two-cycle engines. A few builders used aluminum block automobile engines. American builders tended to use chainsaw, lawnmower, snowmobile and air- and liquid-cooled automobile engines.
The power-to-weight ratio of an automobile engine is such that a fairly large machine is required just to carry the engine; they also take up a great amount of space. Early hovercraft designers and builders put an inordinate effort into adapting engines and trying to persuade transmission and fan systems to stay intact. During the late 1960s, since the United Kingdom was well equipped with engines suitable for hovercraft, British designers and builders were able to concentrate on operating and testing hovercraft. This yet another reason why light hovercraft evolved more rapidly in the United Kingdom during that period than in any other nation.
The 1970s were the golden years of the snowmobile in America. In 1971, North American sales soared to nearly half a million units. Engine manufacturers, primarily in Japan, were developing snowmobile engines with a power-to-weight ratio suitable for hovercraft. Reliability, dependability and ease of starting were improved with the introduction of capacitor discharge ignitions, better materials and manufacturing tolerances, and high performance resonance exhaust systems. These engines began to find their way into hovercraft toward the end of the decade. At the same time, trail bikes began to increase in popularity and their engines, as well as those of go-karts, were also adapted for use in hovercraft.
Fans and Propellers
As with engines, fans and propellers also fascinate hovercraft enthusiasts, in fact, they represent a starting point for many a would-be hovercraft builder. In the early days, much of the hovercraft theory that abounded dealt with fans and propellers. With decades of hindsight, what works best is well known and most builders use commercially available fans.
Some of the heavier and larger light hovercraft use centrifugal fans for lift, similar to those found in home heating and air conditioning units. The axial flow fan, however, which can be found everywhere for cooling, venting and circulating air, has been found to be particularly suitable for hovercraft because it efficiently moves large volumes of air at low pressures.
All amphibious light hovercraft are propelled by either fans or propellers. The quantity of static thrust available to accelerate a hovercraft is important. One measure of performance is thrust efficiency, or the ratio of thrust per unit of power. Air devices are notoriously inefficient when compared to tracked vehicles or even water propellers. The highest efficiency static thrust air devices are helicopter rotors. Next on the efficiency scale comes propellers, followed by ducted axial flow fans.
Safety considerations now dictate that a propeller must be enclosed. A properly constructed wire cage is heavy and does nothing for the appearance of a hovercraft, so most designers prefer to enclose propellers in ducts. Since the late 1980s, although both open and ducted propellers dominate the American do-it-yourself market, ducted thrust fans are found on the vast majority of light hovercraft in Great Britain and throughout the rest of Europe. The ducted fan's universal appeal has much to do with safety considerations as well as aesthetic considerations.
Many types of power transmission have been employed in light hovercraft over the years, but the most common is the toothed timing belt. A more refined version is the HTD belt, which can be found on most of the larger commercially manufactured light hovercraft. Practically all hovercraft today are directly coupled, except for the heaviest models in which various types of clutches are utilized.
Larger hovercraft sometimes employ skirt-shift controls, which move the inner skirt attachments to change the air cushion's center of pressure and enable the craft to roll or pitch. Such complications are unnecessary on lighter, smaller hovercraft. Pilots and passengers in light hovercraft move about to adjust trim as desired. This method, referred to as kinesthetic control, is extremely important in small racing hovercraft. The pilot must constantly shift his/her weight about to assist the craft in operation while accelerating, decelerating or banking into turns in order to prevent it from nose-diving into the water ("plowing in") or becoming airborne.
All light hovercraft are fitted with vertical rudder blades, which are mounted in the fan or propeller slipstream, and controlled through a steering wheel, joystick, or bicycle-style handlebar. Some craft have horizontal elevators for longitudinal trim. These are especially useful for hovercraft in which the driver cannot readily move about.
When a hovercraft lift engine is separate from the thrust engine, precise control over the air cushion is possible. Such control helps to reduce dust and spray, minimizes skirt drag, and makes it possible to adjust the skirt drag for braking. This configuration also makes stationary hovering possible (hovering in place without forward motion).
Neoteric Hovercraft, Inc. in the United States, owns the patent for reverse thrust buckets, which not only improve control, but also allows Neoteric models the distinction of being the only hovercraft manufactured with the effective capability of braking, backing up and hovering in place.
The flexible skirt has had a profound effect on the practicality of hovercraft and are essentially the base technology of hovercraft. Most of today's skirt know-how was invented in Great Britain during the mid-1960s. In the United States, the majority of homebuilt hovercraft tended to use the non-flow bag skirt, the simplest of skirts and the most rugged. However, bag skirts have a tendency to bounce. British hovercraft started out using bag skirts in the late 1960s, but by the 1980s most were using segmented (finger) skirts constructed of neoprene-coated nylon, which is superior to most other fabrics as hovercraft skirt material.
The selection of building materials for hovercraft followed a natural course. The first builders began by using wood, which is still popular today. The majority of American homebuilt hovercraft are made of wood. Some early builders used fabric-covered structures, fiberglass (requiring expensive molds) and aluminum. Some of the larger passenger-carrying hovercraft are aluminum; others are composite fiberglass with a "foam sandwich" construction.
It is not difficult to make light hovercraft structurally sound; over the years there have been few examples of structural failures. Structural stiffness in light hovercraft is not critical because the structure is supported evenly by the cushion pressure. Even the crudest hovercraft will work; masterful craftsmanship and design are not critical to their successful operation.
Today, most manufactured light hovercraft are constructed from chopmat fiberglass. The hull is constructed on a mold and then sandwiched between a urethane core and a fiberglass body.
The Future of the Hovercraft
The hovercraft, no longer considered an obscure, impractical vehicle, is in operation today throughout the world for a great variety of purposes, including leisure sport and racing, search and rescue, ice fishing, hunting, surveying, flood control, environmental projects, agriculture, icebreaking, water transportation, education and a myriad of other purposes.
The hovercraft industry, however, is still a wide-open area for research and potential breakthroughs. Technically, light hovercraft are poised to continue the advances developed during the last few decades.
Small, light hovercraft have the potential for becoming primary transport vehicles in many undeveloped areas. They can be easily constructed onsite, and their versatility suggests worldwide applications.
As the number of light hovercraft continues to increase throughout the world, new applications will be found. Because hovercraft are not as limited as snowmobiles geographically, their use for racing, cruising, hunting and commercial applications are likely to eventually exceed that of the snowmobile. Light hovercraft should become a significant new vehicle in the marine industry; their concept represents one of the few breakthroughs in marine transportation since the hydrofoil or the very first boat.
The future of light hovercraft for sport, recreation and racing should be assured. Hovercraft racing has, not surprisingly, become an established and growing international sport. Light hovercraft make spectacular and unusually safe racing vehicles, and are inexpensive compared to wheeled racing vehicles. Natural tracks for hovercraft races exist in nearly every city in the world, and a first-class hovercraft race needs little more than some water and adjacent land, ice or snow.
The hovercraft has come a long way from the "flying machines" of ancient Greece and Sir Christopher Cockerell's tin cans. In the present day, hovercraft are attracting reawakened attention, primarily because technological developments have led to greater reliability and ease of operation. The last forty years of development, in particular, have taken hovercraft technology from the domain of great inventors and put it into the hands of the public, from large corporations and the military to young schoolchildren.
The Internet and the media are serving to foster this reawakening and introducing hovercraft, perhaps for the first time, to millions internationally. As one example, Bubba’s Hover, the video of Bubba Watson’s BW1 hovercraft golf cart manufactured by Neoteric Hovercraft, become an overnight global success and a viral novelty in cyberspace. Bubba’s Hover captured 7.6 million views on YouTube in just 17 days, and led to what has been called a “media tsunami” when the project was featured by major media worldwide.
Hovercraft naturally attract attention and as innovative applications, such as a hovercraft golf cart, are explored, this attention will grow.
Anyone of any age who has ever dreamed of flying can now experience that dream. Hovercraft kits are available for the do-it-yourselfer and, even though there are still few hovercraft manufacturers compared, for instance, to automobile manufacturers, personal hovercraft can be purchased for less than the price of a good motorcycle. Hoverclubs for private hovercraft enthusiasts have been established in most major nations, and hoverclub rallies and World Racing events attract growing numbers of participants and spectators each year. Hovercraft are featured in mainstream entertainment, such as James Bond films and Junkyard Wars. Worldwide school hovercraft programs, such as www.DiscoverHover.org, are taking this fascinating technology into mainstream education.
The history of the hovercraft continues to be written. Today
and in the future, however, that history is being written
not only by inventors, engineers and movie studios. The history
of the hovercraft is now being written by your neighbors building
a hovercraft in their garage; by your local fire department
performing rescues; by your child building a hovercraft at
school; and by you. The opportunities may be slim for you
to go down in history as the inventor of a new vehicle or
as an Olympics winner. In contrast, hovercraft today and tomorrow
are very much an equal opportunity, available to everyone.
If you've ever wanted to fly, if you've ever wanted to race,
if you've ever wanted to become a part of history, now is
The British Hovercraft Museum Trust, an online
encyclopedia describing the history of hovercraft;
The History of Air Cushion Vehicles (from 1716); Kalerghi-McLeavy Publications, 1963; Leslie Herbert Hayward, author.
History of Hovercraft – Pioneering Vessels and People; U.S. Hovercraft Society; David Lavis, Editor
Hovercraft Technology, Economics and Applications; Elsevier, 1989; Joseph R. Amyot, editor; Christopher Fitzgerald, contributor
The Speed and Power of Ships: A Manual of Marine Propulsion; US Government Printing Office, 1933: Admiral David W. Taylor, author.
Neoteric Hovercraft, Inc.
1649 Tippecanoe Street Terre Haute, Indiana USA 47807-2394
Telephone: 1-812-234-1120 / 1-800-285-3761 Fax: 877-640-8507
Homepage: www.neoterichovercraft.com / www.rescuehovercraft.com
© 2018 Neoteric Hovercraft, Inc
All rights reserved. Unauthorized use of any content on this website is illegal.
Criminal copyright infringement, including infringement without monetary gain,
is investigated by the United States FBI and is punishable by up to
5 years in U.S. federal prison and a fine of US $250,000